
doi: 10.1111/sms.12285
pmid: 24975992
The present study investigated the applicability of a muscle volume prediction method using only the muscle length (LM), the maximum anatomical cross‐sectional area (ACSAmax), and a muscle‐specific shape factor (p) on the quadriceps vastii. LM, ACSAmax, muscle volume, and p were obtained from magnetic resonance images of the vastus intermedius (VI), lateralis (VL), and medialis (VM) of female (n = 20) and male (n = 17) volleyball athletes. The average p was used to predict muscle volumes (Vp) using the equation Vp = p × ACSAmax × LM. Although there were significant differences in the muscle dimensions between male and female athletes, p was similar and on average 0.582, 0.658, 0.543 for the VI, VL, and VM, respectively. The position of ACSAmax showed low variability and was at 57%, 60%, and 81% of the thigh length for VI, VL, and VM. Further, there were no significant differences between measured and predicted muscle volumes with root mean square differences of 5–8%. These results suggest that the muscle shape of the quadriceps vastii is independent of muscle dimensions or sex and that the prediction method could be sensitive enough to detect changes in muscle volume related to degeneration, atrophy, or hypertrophy.
Adult, Male, Sex Characteristics, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Biological, Quadriceps Muscle, Volleyball, Thigh, Body Size, Humans, Female
Adult, Male, Sex Characteristics, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Biological, Quadriceps Muscle, Volleyball, Thigh, Body Size, Humans, Female
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
