
arXiv: 2111.06632
AbstractThis work is focused on finding G‐optimal designs theoretically for kriging models with two‐dimensional inputs and separable exponential covariance structures. For design comparison, the notion of evenness of two‐dimensional grid designs is developed. The mathematical relationship between the design and the supremum of the mean squared prediction error (SMSPE) function is studied and then optimal designs are explored for both prospective and retrospective design scenarios. In the case of prospective designs, the new design is developed before the experiment is conducted and the regularly spaced grid is shown to be the G‐optimal design. Retrospective designs are constructed by adding or deleting points from an already existing design. Deterministic algorithms are developed to find the best possible retrospective designs (which minimizes the SMSPE). It is found that a more evenly spread design under the G‐optimality criterion leads to the best possible retrospective design. For all the cases of finding the optimal prospective designs and the best possible retrospective designs, both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks have been considered. The proposed methodology for finding retrospective designs is illustrated with a spatiotemporal river water quality monitoring experiment.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Statistics, prospective designs, Methodology (stat.ME), retrospective designs, 62K05, grid designs, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Statistics - Methodology, separable covariance
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Statistics, prospective designs, Methodology (stat.ME), retrospective designs, 62K05, grid designs, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, Statistics - Methodology, separable covariance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
