
doi: 10.1111/rssb.12010
handle: 10419/90457
SummaryThere are two popular smoothing parameter selection methods for spline smoothing. First, smoothing parameters can be estimated by minimizing criteria that approximate the average mean-squared error of the regression function estimator. Second, the maximum likelihood paradigm can be employed, under the assumption that the regression function is a realization of some stochastic process. The asymptotic properties of both smoothing parameter estimators for penalized splines are studied and compared. A simulation study and a real data example illustrate the theoretical findings.
Maximum likelihood; Mean squared error minimizer; Penalized splines; Smoothing splines, Penalized splines, Smoothing splines, ddc:330, Average mean-squared error minimizer Maximum likelihood Oracle parameters, Mean squared error minimizer, Maximum likelihood
Maximum likelihood; Mean squared error minimizer; Penalized splines; Smoothing splines, Penalized splines, Smoothing splines, ddc:330, Average mean-squared error minimizer Maximum likelihood Oracle parameters, Mean squared error minimizer, Maximum likelihood
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
