
handle: 10419/172326
SummarySmall area models typically depend on the validity of model assumptions. For example, a commonly used version of the empirical best predictor relies on the Gaussian assumptions of the error terms of the linear mixed regression model: a feature rarely observed in applications with real data. The paper tackles the potential lack of validity of the model assumptions by using data-driven scaled transformations as opposed to ad hoc chosen transformations. Different types of transformations are explored, the estimation of the transformation parameters is studied in detail under the linear mixed regression model and transformations are used in small area prediction of linear and non-linear parameters. The use of scaled transformations is crucial as it enables fitting the linear mixed regression model with standard software and hence it simplifies the work of the data analyst. Mean-squared error estimation that accounts for the uncertainty due to the estimation of the transformation parameters is explored by using the parametric and semiparametric (wild) bootstrap. The methods proposed are illustrated by using real survey and census data for estimating income deprivation parameters for municipalities in the Mexican state of Guerrero. Simulation studies and the results from the application show that using carefully selected, data-driven transformations can improve small area estimation.
small area estimation, 330, MSE estimation, Small area estimation, ddc:330, MSE es- timation, 300 Sozialwissenschaften::310 Statistiken, maximum likelihood estimation, Applications of statistics, adaptive transformations, linear mixed regression model, poverty mapping, maximum likelihood theory, data-driven transformations, random effects, bootstrap
small area estimation, 330, MSE estimation, Small area estimation, ddc:330, MSE es- timation, 300 Sozialwissenschaften::310 Statistiken, maximum likelihood estimation, Applications of statistics, adaptive transformations, linear mixed regression model, poverty mapping, maximum likelihood theory, data-driven transformations, random effects, bootstrap
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
