
AbstractPrepared learning theory posits that prepared associations are acquired rapidly and resist extinction. Although it has been shown repeatedly that prepared associations resist extinction, there is currently little evidence to support the proposal of faster acquisition. The current study provides such evidence using a within‐subjects conditioning procedure with a 50% reinforcement schedule. Participants were presented with pictures of four animals, two fear‐relevant (snake, spider) and two nonfear‐relevant (fish, bird), one of each paired with an unpleasant electrotactile stimulus on 50% of the trials during acquisition. Differential electrodermal responding was observed within the first two blocks of acquisition for fear‐relevant but not for nonfear‐relevant conditional stimuli, confirming the prediction that prepared associations are acquired faster than nonprepared associations.
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Preparedness, Adolescent, Conditioning, Classical, 150, 3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Young Adult, 2737 Physiology (medical), 616, Humans, Attention, Fear learning, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 1314 Physiology, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Electrodermal responses, Female, Photic Stimulation
Adult, Male, Time Factors, Preparedness, Adolescent, Conditioning, Classical, 150, 3206 Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Young Adult, 2737 Physiology (medical), 616, Humans, Attention, Fear learning, 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 1314 Physiology, Fear, Galvanic Skin Response, Electrodermal responses, Female, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
