
doi: 10.1111/plar.12344
AbstractAdultery judgments in customary courts in Botswana reflect changing everyday practices and normative understandings both with regard to marriage and broader ideas of gender equality. These changed perceptions parallel a worldwide shift in the legal understanding of adultery from being a crime to a civil offense and then, more recently, a non offense. Social change movements and judicial reforms responsive to both regional and international gender and judicial activism have arguably influenced recent judgments in the Botswana High Court regarding adultery. Although the country's customary courts continue to recognize adultery as an offense (known as “breaking the yard”), they too follow customary law as “living law”; that is, they are responsive to considerations of equity and quotidian practices that parallel wider ideologically critical movements, and historical processes of judicial innovation and legal reform elsewhere.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
