
doi: 10.1111/phn.12306
pmid: 27859524
AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices for hearing and respiratory health/safety among farmers in seven Midwestern states served by a federally funded Agricultural Center. Findings provided a baseline to longitudinally track the Agricultural Center's program outcomes and to design community education to improve safety and health among farmers.Design and SampleThis was a cross‐sectional study using a 30 item mailed survey to describe farmers' operations, demographics, health conditions, related information sources, and knowledge/attitude/practices for personal protective equipment (PPE) (i.e., ear plugs/muffs and dust masks/respirators).MeasuresFrequencies and percentages were calculated for each item and according to responses from younger versus older farmers. The unit of study was farm operators (N = 280) randomly selected from a publicly available database of corn/soybean and hog farmers in seven Midwestern states.ResultsFindings revealed important knowledge gaps among respondents regarding (1) hazardous exposure sources; (2) long‐term health consequences of noise/dust exposure; (3) proper selection/fitting of PPE.ConclusionsPublic health nurses and primary care providers in rural communities should address specific knowledge gaps in order to enhance farmers' perceived understanding of their susceptibility to hazardous exposures. Increasing farmers' knowledge through preferred venues may help to improve PPE effectiveness.
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Farmers, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Middle Aged, Midwestern United States, Occupational Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Safety, Hearing Disorders, Aged
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Farmers, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Middle Aged, Midwestern United States, Occupational Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Safety, Hearing Disorders, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
