
doi: 10.1111/phc3.12390
handle: 10871/23005
Abstract Until recently, philosophers and psychologists conceived of emotions as brain‐ and body‐bound affairs. But researchers have started to challenge this internalist and individualist orthodoxy. A rapidly growing body of work suggests that some emotions incorporate external resources and thus extend beyond the neurophysiological confines of organisms; some even argue that emotions can be socially extended and shared by multiple agents. Call this the extended emotions thesis (ExE). In this article, we consider different ways of understanding ExE in philosophy, psychology, and the cognitive sciences. First, we outline the background of the debate and discuss different argumentative strategies for ExE. In particular, we distinguish ExE from cognate but more moderate claims about the embodied and situated nature of cognition and emotion (Section 1). We then dwell upon two dimensions of ExE: emotions extended by material culture and by the social factors (Section 2). We conclude by defending ExE against some objections (Section 3) and point to desiderata for future research (Section 4).
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/FacultyOfHumanities; name=Faculty of Humanities, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/FacultyOfHumanities, Collective Emotions, Emotions, 150, Extended and Distributed Emotions, Situated Cognition, 100, Extended Mind Thesis, Embodiment, Emotion Regulation, Embodied Cognition, Faculty of Humanities, Affectivity, Extended Mind
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/FacultyOfHumanities; name=Faculty of Humanities, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/FacultyOfHumanities, Collective Emotions, Emotions, 150, Extended and Distributed Emotions, Situated Cognition, 100, Extended Mind Thesis, Embodiment, Emotion Regulation, Embodied Cognition, Faculty of Humanities, Affectivity, Extended Mind
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
