
doi: 10.1111/nyas.15344
pmid: 40296207
Abstract Group work is regarded as an especially promising method for engaging with eco‐anxiety and other difficult eco‐emotions. This article introduces a new method for facilitated group work based on the process model of eco‐anxiety and ecological grief (hereafter, the process model). The method combines elements from timeline exercises, social learning, spectrum line methods, and somatic methods. Observations and feedback from a pilot workshop are used to develop the method further. Participants explored their eco‐anxiety journeys in small groups. The phases and dimensions of the process model were printed on paper, and people could move in space while they reflected on them. The participants were encouraged to experiment with somatic movements and sounds. The possible balance or imbalance between action, distancing (including self‐care), and grieving (including other emotional engagement) was explored. The workshop ended with creative co‐thinking about how to find more balance. This method was clearly useful for the participants, but more research is needed to explore its use with different audiences. This method can be facilitated by people other than therapists if they have suitable skills, but it also allows for in‐depth use in therapy and psychological interventions. Variations of using the method or parts of it are discussed.
Emotions, Psychotherapy, Group, Humans, Grief, Anxiety, Models, Psychological, Group Processes
Emotions, Psychotherapy, Group, Humans, Grief, Anxiety, Models, Psychological, Group Processes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
