
Summary Vascular systems are intimately related to the shape and spatial arrangement of the plant organs they support. We investigate the largely unexplored association between spiral phyllotaxis and the vascular system in Asteraceae flower heads. We imaged heads of eight species using synchrotron‐based X‐ray micro‐computed tomography and applied original virtual reality and haptic software to explore head vasculature in three dimensions. We then constructed a computational model to infer a plausible patterning mechanism. The vascular system in the head of the model plant Gerbera hybrida is qualitatively different from those of Bellis perennis and Helianthus annuus , characterized previously. Cirsium vulgare , Craspedia globosa , Echinacea purpurea , Echinops bannaticus , and Tanacetum vulgare represent variants of the Bellis and Helianthus systems. In each species, the layout of the main strands is stereotypical, but details vary. The observed vascular patterns can be generated by a common computational model with different parameter values. In spite of the observed differences of vascular systems in heads, they may be produced by a conserved mechanism. The diversity and irregularities of vasculature stand in contrast with the relative uniformity and regularity of phyllotactic patterns, confirming that phyllotaxis in heads is not driven by the vasculature.
computational modeling, synchrotron X-ray micro-CT, vascular architecture, Flowers, X-Ray Microtomography, sectoriality, reticulation, Asteraceae, 11831 Plant biology, Models, Biological, phyllotaxis, Species Specificity, Computer Simulation, Plant Vascular Bundle, visualization
computational modeling, synchrotron X-ray micro-CT, vascular architecture, Flowers, X-Ray Microtomography, sectoriality, reticulation, Asteraceae, 11831 Plant biology, Models, Biological, phyllotaxis, Species Specificity, Computer Simulation, Plant Vascular Bundle, visualization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
