Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Modern Theologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Modern Theology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

The Lord of Limits: On Trinitarian Ontology and the Tragic

Authors: Khegan M. Delport;

The Lord of Limits: On Trinitarian Ontology and the Tragic

Abstract

AbstractThe essay focuses on a dimension of the trinitarian metaphysics of Rowan Williams. It aims to articulate his understanding of the ontological implications of the Trinity, particularly in relation to his theological leitmotif of the tragic, and has a reparative focus of easing some of the tensions that may arise in such relating. The argument brings focus on the interconnections between trinitarian identity‐in‐difference and creaturely finitude, showing that Williams's trinitarian ontology articulates a model of metaphysical analogy in which creaturely limit and externality is grounded in the distinction of the Father and the Son, in a trinitarian circulation of dispossession and reception. This trinitarian movement of giving and receiving forms the principle of created finitude and contingency, exemplified in the experience of “distance” between the crucified Son and the Father. However, this hypostatic distinction is supplemented by a movement of generativity in which self‐expenditure is not the mutual annihilation of the dyad of Father and Son, but always already a donation of identity‐in‐otherness in which there is no divine “individuality” prior to relation. Moreover, intratrinitarian love is not merely an erotic movement of self‐fulfilment in the other, but a desire for the desire of the other, a ‘deflection’ to the other of the other. In the trinitarian logic, this other is conceived as the personal hypostasis of Holy Spirit. Hereby, Williams sustains a grammar of trinitarian aseity while also giving a grounding for finitude within the intratrinitarian difference in which creatures are incorporated, through the Spirit, into the eternal kenosis of the Son.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid