
doi: 10.1111/mec.70333 , 10.32942/x2b08r
ABSTRACT As the biosphere faces accelerating environmental disruption including climate change and the prospect of an anthropogenically‐driven mass extinction, understanding the mechanisms that enable species to adapt has become increasingly urgent. One mechanism attracting growing attention is adaptive introgression, the transfer of beneficial genetic variation between closely related species. Although frequently invoked as a potential driver of adaptation to rapid environmental change, including climate change, its overall importance remains debated. In this review, we adopt a balanced, evidence‐based perspective. After introducing approaches for identifying potential donor and recipient species of introgression events, we review both the classical methods for detecting introgression and selection and the recent methodological advances that allow their joint inference. We discuss roughly 20 published studies representing taxonomic, geographic and climate diversity that provide at least partial support for a connection between introgression and climate‐related adaptation, most often involving adaptation to climatic oscillations during the late Pleistocene rather than to contemporary climate adaptation. Although adaptive introgression is frequently invoked in evolutionary and conservation biology, we highlight a persistent gap between its theoretical expectation and the scarcity of well‐documented, functionally or ecologically validated examples. Considering the pressing challenges to preserve biodiversity and improve predictions of adaptive potential under climate change, addressing this gap is of paramount importance. We conclude by proposing key research directions at the intersection of macroevolution, microevolution and the evolutionary ecology of communities.
adaptive introgression methods, selection inferences, climate adaptation, species resilience, [SDV.GEN.GA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Animal genetics, conservation genomics, [SDV.GEN.GPL] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Plants genetics, evolutionary ecology, hybridisation, [SDV.GEN.GPO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], gene flow, [SDV.BID] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity
adaptive introgression methods, selection inferences, climate adaptation, species resilience, [SDV.GEN.GA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Animal genetics, conservation genomics, [SDV.GEN.GPL] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Plants genetics, evolutionary ecology, hybridisation, [SDV.GEN.GPO] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Populations and Evolution [q-bio.PE], gene flow, [SDV.BID] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biodiversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
