Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Veterinar...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Pharmacokinetic of levamisole in speckled surubimPseudoplatystoma corruscans

Authors: R B, Zanon; B S, Cerozi; T S C, Silva; J E P, Cyrino;

Pharmacokinetic of levamisole in speckled surubimPseudoplatystoma corruscans

Abstract

Intensification of production systems exposes fish to stress agents, such as poor water quality and crowding, affecting physiological condition of cultured fish, negatively influencing their immune system and increasing susceptibility to microorganism infections (Gopalakannan & Arul, 2006; Sado et al., 2010). Synthetic chemicals and antibiotics have been used to treat fish disease outbreaks. However, indiscriminate and frequent use of drugs in animals is a concern, even for levamisole (Lewis et al., 1980). Antibiotics, specially, may lead the development of drug-resistant micro-organisms, immunosuppression and residues buildup in the animals (Rijkers et al., 1980; Anderson, 1992; Lunden et al., 1998; Maqsood et al., 2009). Furthermore, preventive measures are better than using drugs and chemicals to control these problems (Maqsood et al., 2009). In such a context, levamisole, a synthetic imidazothiazole approved as anthelminthic for humans and many mammals (Li et al., 2006b), has been shown to have immunostimulatory properties for humans and animals, fish and shrimp included. The use of levamisole as vaccines adjuvant in fish has elicited higher levels of circulating antibody, improved antibody response and nonspecific immunity (Anderson & Jeney, 1992). Dietary levamisole has also being reported to positively affect IgM values (Cuesta et al., 2004) and to enhance fish resistance to pathogenic bacteria (Kajita et al., 1990; Findlay & Munday, 2000; Sahoo & Mukherjee, 2002; Gopalakannan & Arul, 2006; Li et al., 2006a). Levamisole has also been shown to enhance in vitro antibody production, superoxide anion and phagocytic activity (Siwicki, 1989; Siwicki et al., 1990; Mulero et al., 1998; Morrison et al., 2001; Sahoo & Mukherjee, 2002; Ispir & Yonar, 2007). In spite of such encouraging results and the already regular use of the substance as immunostimulatory drug in aquaculture, knowledge on levamisole’s pharmacokinetic parameters in fish is still scarce. This paper reports original and pioneer data on drug clearance after intramuscular administration of levamisole to fish, using the neotropical Siluriform speckled surubim Pseudoplatystoma corruscans as study model. This species is an important freshwater, carnivorous South America catfish, attractive to both the capture fisheries and fish culture (Lovshin & Cyrino, 1998). Analytical grade levamisole (>99%) was collected from Sigma Chemical (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Plasma levamisole quantitation was performed according to El-Kholy and Kemppainen (2003); analyses were performed on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC System, grade solvents collected from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), on a Phenomenex (Luna) C18 250 9 4.4 mm chromatographic column packed with 5-lm particle size reverse-phase; detection was performed on a UV–Vis detector, 225-nm wavelength. The mobile phase was an acetic acid 2%: methanol (1/1 v/v) solution, 1 mL/min flux, at 25 °C. Levamisole extraction was carried out according to Garcia et al. (1990); quantitation limit was 1.0 lg/mL and detection limit was 0.5 lg/mL. Twenty-one healthy, juvenile specked surubim were individually weighed (390 ± 40 g) and kept in 21 plastic tanks (80 L) in a closed-loop, constantly aerated system (27 ± 0.5 ° C; pH 8.07 ± 0.07; dissolved oxygen 6.1 ± 0.4; conductivity 4.13 ± 0.04 mS/cm; salinity 0.22 ± 0.004%; total ammonia 0.25 ppm; dissolved total solid 2.64 ± 0.03 g/L), under a 12-h dark–12-h light photoperiod. Fish were hand-fed a commercial diet in two daily meals diet (crude protein 40%, digestible energy 3400 kcal/kg); feeding was stopped 24 h before drug administration. Fish were anesthetized (Eugenol [Biodinâmica, Ibipora, SP, Brazil] 1:50 000 v/v) and injected once in the dorsal muscle, at beginning of dorsal fin, with 50-mg levamisole/kg body weight, dissolved in 1.0 mL of sterile physiological solution (0.6%). All of them recovered normal behavior within 30 sec. It means fish were not under influence of the anesthetic during the early time points. Blood samples (2.0 mL) were collected from the caudal vein using plastic syringe imbibed in 10% EDTA solution at 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 12.0 h after injection. Each fish was used only once for blood sampling; three animals were used per time point. Plasma was collected through centrifugation (15 min; 2000 g)

Keywords

Levamisole, Antinematodal Agents, Area Under Curve, Animals, Injections, Intramuscular, Catfishes, Half-Life

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!