
doi: 10.1111/jsap.12676
pmid: 28369886
ObjectiveThis prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled, double‐blinded study aimed to evaluate efficacy of commercially available feline anti‐parvovirus antibodies in dogs with canine parvovirus infection.MethodsFirst, cross‐protection of feline panleukopenia virus antibodies against canine parvovirus was evaluated in vitro. In the subsequent prospective clinical trial, 31 dogs with clinical signs of canine parvovirus infection and a positive faecal canine parvovirus polymerase chain reaction were randomly assigned to a group receiving feline panleukopenia virus antibodies (n=15) or placebo (n=16). All dogs received additional routine treatment. Clinical signs, blood parameters, time to clinical recovery and mortality were compared between the groups. Serum antibody titres and quantitative faecal polymerase chain reaction were compared on days 0, 3, 7, and 14.ResultsIn vitro, canine parvovirus was fully neutralised by feline panleukopenia virus antibodies. There were no detected significant differences in clinical signs, time to clinical recovery, blood parameters, mortality, faecal virus load, or viral shedding between groups. Dogs in the placebo group showed a significant increase of serum antibody titres and a significant decrease of faecal virus load between day 14 and day 0, which was not detectable in dogs treated with feline panleukopenia virus antibodies.Clinical SignificanceNo significant beneficial effect of passively transferred feline anti‐parvovirus antibodies in the used dosage regimen on the treatment of canine parvovirus infection was demonstrated.
Parvoviridae Infections, Dogs, Treatment Outcome, Parvovirus, Canine, Cats, Animals, Dog Diseases, Prospective Studies, Feline Panleukopenia Virus, Antibodies, Viral
Parvoviridae Infections, Dogs, Treatment Outcome, Parvovirus, Canine, Cats, Animals, Dog Diseases, Prospective Studies, Feline Panleukopenia Virus, Antibodies, Viral
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
