Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of the Europ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AFAST – Adult Female Acne Scoring Tool: an easy‐to‐use tool for scoring acne in adult females

Authors: N, Auffret; J-P, Claudel; M-T, Leccia; F, Poli; D, Farhi; B, Dréno;

AFAST – Adult Female Acne Scoring Tool: an easy‐to‐use tool for scoring acne in adult females

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAcne is a concern in adults, especially in women. The specifications in current acne grading systems are not applicable to this particular population.ObjectiveTo develop and validate a measurement tool (AFAST: adult female acne scoring tool) for acne in women by taking into account the specific locations of adult female acne, and to evaluate the impact of the photographic modalities on rating reproducibility.MethodsSix experts in dermatology rated pictures of 54 women with a phototype from I to IV during two sessions, with an interval of 24 h. They rated the acne severity on the face using the GEA scale (Score 1) together with a new scale to assess acne on the mandibular zone (Score 2). Pictures of 30 women were taken using a standardized photographic device; pictures of the other 24 women were taken by their own dermatologists during daily practice.ResultsAt session 1, the inter‐rater's reproducibility was good for Score 1 with an ICC of 0.77 [0.72–0.83], and excellent for Score 2 with an ICC of 0.87 [0.82–0.91]. Between sessions 1 and 2, the mean intra‐rater's reproducibility was excellent for both scores with an ICC of 0.88 [0.84–0.92] for Score 1, and an ICC of 0.87 [0.78–0.92] for Score 2. Photographic modalities had no significant effect on the inter‐ and intra‐rater's reproducibility.ConclusionFor the first time, it has been demonstrated that AFAST can accurately rate acne severity in women. It is a promising, easy‐to‐use tool for both daily practice and clinical investigation.

Keywords

Adult, Acne Vulgaris, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Severity of Illness Index

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!