
Home blood pressure monitoring provides multiple measurements in the usual environment of each individual, allows the detection of intermediate hypertension phenotypes (white‐coat and masked hypertension), and appears to have superior prognostic value compared to the conventional office blood pressure measurements. Accumulating evidence suggests that home blood pressure monitoring improves long‐term hypertension control rates. Moreover, it is widely available, relatively inexpensive, and well accepted by patients. Thus, current guidelines recommend home blood pressure monitoring as an essential method for the evaluation of almost all untreated and treated patients with suspected or treated hypertension. Validated automated upper‐arm cuff devices with automated storage and averaging of readings should be used. The home blood pressure monitoring schedule for 4 to 7 days with exclusion of the first day (12–24 readings) should be averaged to provide values for decision making.
Office Visits, Self-Management, Decision Making, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Determination, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Prognosis, blood pressure measurement; diagnosis; self-measurement; treatment;, Predictive Value of Tests, blood pressure measurement; diagnosis; self-measurement; treatment; Internal Medicine; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Masked Hypertension, Hypertension, Humans, Algorithms, White Coat Hypertension
Office Visits, Self-Management, Decision Making, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Determination, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Prognosis, blood pressure measurement; diagnosis; self-measurement; treatment;, Predictive Value of Tests, blood pressure measurement; diagnosis; self-measurement; treatment; Internal Medicine; Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Masked Hypertension, Hypertension, Humans, Algorithms, White Coat Hypertension
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
