
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) readings predict the increased risks of cardiovascular events and end‐organ damage independent of office blood pressure (BP). Numeracy (the ability to handle numbers) may limit the feasibility of patients' performing HBPM. The authors analyzed data from 409 adults recruited from 12 North Carolina primary care clinics who completed a three‐item numeracy assessment, the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine–Short Form health literacy assessment, and HBPM over 2 weeks. Among the 409 participants, 73% were college graduates and 69% had adequate numeracy. Completion of HBPM was greater among those with adequate numeracy (96.2% vs 93.7%; P=.009) and did not correlate with health literacy scores. More participants with adequate numeracy reported completion of ≥85% of readings than those with low numeracy (95% vs 88%; P=.018). Adequate numeracy, but not high literacy, is associated with more complete HBPM reporting. Whether higher numeracy is associated with more accurate self‐reported readings is an area of future research.
Adult, Male, Biometry, 330, 610, North Carolina, Humans, Mental Competency, Blood pressure--Measurement, Public health, Primary Health Care, Numeracy, Health literacy, Patient education, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Middle Aged, Health Literacy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Social Class, Feasibility Studies, Medicine, Female, Self Report, Mathematics
Adult, Male, Biometry, 330, 610, North Carolina, Humans, Mental Competency, Blood pressure--Measurement, Public health, Primary Health Care, Numeracy, Health literacy, Patient education, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Middle Aged, Health Literacy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Social Class, Feasibility Studies, Medicine, Female, Self Report, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
