
pmid: 21950803
Infrequent count data in psychological research are commonly modelled using zero‐inflated Poisson regression. This model can be viewed as a latent mixture of an “always‐zero” component and a Poisson component. Hurdle models are an alternative class of two‐component models that are seldom used in psychological research, but clearly separate the zero counts and the non‐zero counts by using a left‐truncated count model for the latter. In this tutorial we revisit both classes of models, and discuss model comparisons and the interpretation of their parameters. As illustrated with an example from relational psychology, both types of models can easily be fitted using the R‐package pscl.
Models, Statistical, Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to statistics, \texttt{R package pscl}, Data Interpretation, Statistical, \texttt{R}, Humans, Psychology, Female, Poisson Distribution, Applications of statistics to psychology
Models, Statistical, Software, source code, etc. for problems pertaining to statistics, \texttt{R package pscl}, Data Interpretation, Statistical, \texttt{R}, Humans, Psychology, Female, Poisson Distribution, Applications of statistics to psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 161 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
