Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Zoologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Zoology
Article . 1968 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A taxonometric investigation of the Alluroididae (Oligochaeta)

Authors: Jamieson, B. G M;

A taxonometric investigation of the Alluroididae (Oligochaeta)

Abstract

By computation of coefficients of similarity and construction of dendrograms by the highest single linkage, average linkage and complete linkage methods, the interrelationships of five members of the Alluroididae have been assessed together with their affinities with Syngenodrilus lamuensis Smith & Green (1919) and Drawida grandis (Bourne), 1894 (Monili‐gastridae). The latter two species were included in the study because Syngenodrilus was placed in the Moniligastridae by its authors and was made the basis of an elaborate hypothesis of moniligastrid evolution by Stephenson (1930) while Gates (1945) argued cogently for its inclusion in the Alluroididae. To assist in “calibrating” phenon levels in terms of taxonomic ranks, species from other families were included in the taxonometric comparisons, namely Pygmaeodrilus affinis and Eukerria saltensis (Ocnerodrilidae), Digaster armifera (Megascolecidae) and an unnamed species of the Tubificidae.The three linkage methods reveal the same interrelationships within the five alluroidids and justify the following taxonomic changes*. Alluroides tanganyikae s. Brinkhurst (1964), from Mt Elgon, is removed from A. tanganyikae Beddard (1906) and made the nominal subspecies of a new species, A. brinkhursti; new material, from Ethiopia, is placed in this species as the new subspecies A. brinkhursti abyssinicus; Alluroides americanus Brinkhurst (1964), from Argentina, is made the type of a new monotypic genus Brinkhurstia; a new species from the Transvaal is placed in a new monotypic genus, as Standeria transvaalensis; Alluroides, Brinkhurstia and Standeria are placed in the subfamily Alluroidinae, while the Syngenodrilinae, which show in all dendrograms a very low phenetic affinity with the Moniligastridae, are transferred to the Alluroididae. Descriptions drawn from the author's examination of type material are given for all the new taxa together with an emended description of A. pordagei Beddard (1894), the type species of the genus, and a synopsis of descriptions of Syngenodrilus lamuensis. A key to species of the Alluroidinae is given in conjunction with a discussion of the comparative morphology of all species of the subfamily.The highest linkage dendrogram, and less certainly, the average and complete linkage dendrograms suggest that the Ocnerodrilidae and Megascolecidae s. Gates (1959) are only distinct at the subfamily level and the author reiterates earlier doubts (Lee, 1959; Jamieson, 1963) that the Octochaetidae and Acanthodrilidae, which are distinguished from each other by their nephridia (Gates, 1959), are valid groups or that they should be excluded from the Megascolecidae s. lat.

Keywords

Behavior and Systematics, Evolution, 590, 1103 Animal Science and Zoology, 1105 Ecology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!