<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
SummaryUsing standard correlation bounds, we show that in generalized estimation equations (GEEs) the so-called ‘working correlation matrix’R(α) for analysing binary data cannot in general be the true correlation matrix of the data. Methods for estimating the correlation param-eter in current GEE software for binary responses disregard these bounds. To show that the GEE applied on binary data has high efficiency, we use a multivariate binary model so that the covariance matrix from estimating equation theory can be compared with the inverse Fisher information matrix. But R(α) should be viewed as the weight matrix, and it should not be confused with the correlation matrix of the binary responses. We also do a comparison with more general weighted estimating equations by using a matrix Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. Our analysis leads to simple rules for the choice of α in an exchangeable or autoregressive AR(1) weight matrix R(α), based on the strength of dependence between the binary variables. An example is given to illustrate the assessment of dependence and choice of α.
Generalized linear models (logistic models), multivariate binary data, Estimation in multivariate analysis, quasi-least squares, Point estimation, odds ratio, repeated measurements
Generalized linear models (logistic models), multivariate binary data, Estimation in multivariate analysis, quasi-least squares, Point estimation, odds ratio, repeated measurements
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |