
pmid: 10985227
Summary. The performance of a diagnostic test is summarized by its receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Under quite natural assumptions about the latent variable underlying the test, the ROC curve is convex. Empirical data on a test's performance often comes in the form of observed true positive and false positive relative frequencies under varying conditions. This paper describes a family of regression models for analyzing such data. The underlying ROC curves are specified by a quality parameter μ and a shape parameter Δ and are guaranteed to be convex provided Δ > 1. Both the position along the ROC curve and the quality parameter Δ are modeled linearly with covariates at the level of the individual. The shape parameter μ enters the model through the link functions log(pμ) ‐ log(1 ‐ pμ) of a binomial regression and is estimated either by search or from an appropriate constructed variate. One simple application is to the meta‐analysis of independent studies of the same diagnostic test, illustrated on some data of Moses, Shapiro, and Littenberg (1993). A second application, to so‐called vigilance data, is given, where ROC curves differ across subjects and modeling of the position along the ROC curve is of primary interest.
receiver operating characteristic, Biometry, Models, Statistical, convexity, lomax distribution, Mediastinal Neoplasms, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, meta-analysis, nonlinear regression, Meta-Analysis as Topic, ROC Curve, General nonlinear regression, Humans, Regression Analysis, False Positive Reactions, vigilance data
receiver operating characteristic, Biometry, Models, Statistical, convexity, lomax distribution, Mediastinal Neoplasms, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, meta-analysis, nonlinear regression, Meta-Analysis as Topic, ROC Curve, General nonlinear regression, Humans, Regression Analysis, False Positive Reactions, vigilance data
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
