
doi: 10.1111/itor.13137
handle: 10316/112038
AbstractIn this paper, we devise a forward‐looking methodology to determine efficient credit portfolios under the IFRS 9 framework. We define and implement a credit loss model based on prospective point‐in‐time probabilities of default. We determine these probabilities of default and the credits' stage allocation through a credit stochastic simulation. This simulation is based on the estimation of transition matrices. Using data from 1981 to 2019, in a non‐homogeneous Markov chain setting, we estimate transition matrices conditional on the global real gross domestic product growth. This allows considering the effects of the economic cycle, which are of great importance in bank management. Finally, we develop a robust optimization model that allows the bank manager to analyze the trade‐off between the annual average portfolio income and the corresponding portfolio volatility. According to the proposed bi‐objective model, we compute the efficient credit portfolios constructed based on 10‐year maturity credits. We compare their structure to those generated by the IAS 39 and CECL accounting frameworks. The results indicate that the IFRS 9 and CECL frameworks generate efficient credit portfolios whose structure penalizes riskier‐rated credits. In turn, the riskier efficient credit portfolios under the IAS 39 framework concentrate entirely on speculative‐grade credits. This pattern is also encountered in efficient credit portfolios constructed based on credits with different maturities, namely 5 and 15 years. Moreover, the longer the maturity of the credits that enter into the composition of the efficient portfolios, the more the speculative‐grade credits tend to be penalized.
credit risk, CECL, IAS 39, IFRS 9, transition matrices, Operations research, mathematical programming, stochastic simulation
credit risk, CECL, IAS 39, IFRS 9, transition matrices, Operations research, mathematical programming, stochastic simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
