
doi: 10.1111/itor.12258
handle: 11311/1004183
AbstractThe generalized bin packing problem (GBPP) is a novel packing problem arising in many transportation and logistic settings, characterized by multiple items and bins attributes and the presence of both compulsory and non‐compulsory items. In this paper, we study the computational complexity and the approximability of the GBPP. We prove that the GBPP cannot be approximated by any constant, unless . We also study the particular case of a single bin type and show that when an unlimited number of bins is available, the GBPP can be reduced to the bin packing with rejection (BPR) problem, which is approximable. We also prove that the GBPP satisfies Bellman's optimality principle and, exploiting this result, we develop a dynamic programming solution approach. Finally, we study the behavior of standard and widespread heuristics such as the first fit, best fit, first fit decreasing, and best fit decreasing. We show that while they successfully approximate previous versions of bin packing problems, they fail to approximate the GBPP.
dynamic programming, Combinatorial optimization, Bellman's optimality principle, bin packing problem, bin packing problem, variable cost and size bin packing problem, approximation; Bellman’s optimality principle, dynamic programming, Dynamic programming, variable cost and size bin packing problem, Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming, approximation
dynamic programming, Combinatorial optimization, Bellman's optimality principle, bin packing problem, bin packing problem, variable cost and size bin packing problem, approximation; Bellman’s optimality principle, dynamic programming, Dynamic programming, variable cost and size bin packing problem, Approximation methods and heuristics in mathematical programming, approximation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
