
AbstractAimTo determine if there are cross‐national differences in nurse understandings of the terms: missed care, rationed care and care left undone.BackgroundNurse researchers from a number of countries have published studies on missed and rationed care. It is not clear if there are differences in understanding the key terms across various language groups.DesignA mixed method questionnaire was distributed to 26 member countries of a nursing research consortium in 2017.MethodsForty‐five responses to a qualitative questionnaire were received; 80% were nurse researchers. These responses were categorized into language groups and analysed for congruence and differences.FindingsThere was congruence across all language groups in interpreting the three terms. Giddens' theory of globalization provides an explanation for this congruence.ConclusionShared understandings are explained by the fact that the majority of participants are nurse researchers with knowledge of English and the research literature. Shared understanding within the globalized academic community does not necessarily translate for clinical or nurse managers, nor does it predetermine solutions.
Missed care, Internationality, Nurse, Medical and Health Sciences, Standardized Nursing Terminology, Patient safety, Nursing Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, Humans, Rationed care, Nursing Care, Globalization
Missed care, Internationality, Nurse, Medical and Health Sciences, Standardized Nursing Terminology, Patient safety, Nursing Research, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, Humans, Rationed care, Nursing Care, Globalization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
