
doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14530
SummaryIn this paper, immersion vacuum cooling with ultrasonic assistance (IVCUA) is compared with immersion vacuum cooling alone (IVC) and vacuum cooling (VC) for cooling time, mass loss, colour, texture profile and water mobility and compartmentalization for cooked meat products. The results reveal that IVCUA clearly enhances the boiling intensity of impregnation liquid compared to IVC. The total cooling time using IVC (126.56 min) for samples from 72 to 4 °C was significantly longer (P < 0.05) than that of IVCUA (96.89 min) and VC (80.48 min). The cooling time of samples from 10 to 4 °C by IVC (46.26 min) was higher (P < 0.05) than that by IVCUA (28.55 min). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in mass loss, colour and texture profile among all samples. However, IVCUA had a higher transverse relation time of bulk water (T24) and MRI proton densities (P < 0.05), as well as a more uniform water distribution compared to IVC.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
