
AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to learn more about levels of knowledge relating to erosive tooth wear and about the most desirable way of disseminating dental information among young adults.MethodsThe research was a cross‐sectional study of 331 young adults (20‐25 years old) attending 25 dental care practices. Participants were asked to fill out a questionnaire with questions about their background, knowledge relating to erosive tooth wear and the preferred way of acquiring information about erosive tooth wear.ResultsThe results showed that there are gaps in the knowledge of young adults about erosive tooth wear. The knowledge score depended on educational level and dental information received in the past. The preferred way of acquiring information was chairside information from an oral health care professional complemented by tailored information in writing.ConclusionThere is a lack of knowledge among young adults about erosive tooth wear. They prefer to receive information from the oral health care professionals accompanied by tailored information in writing. Further research should focus on developing this tailored information in line with the advice given by the oral health care professional.
Adult, Male, Allied Health Personnel, CHILDREN, Young Adult, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, ADOLESCENTS, Humans, Tooth Erosion, ORAL-HEALTH, Dental Care, DENTAL EROSION, Consumer Health Information, Tooth wear, PREVALENCE, Information sources, Cross-Sectional Studies, Knowledge, Erosion, RISK-FACTORS, Educational Status, Female, Tooth Wear, Healthy Living, Young adults
Adult, Male, Allied Health Personnel, CHILDREN, Young Adult, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, ADOLESCENTS, Humans, Tooth Erosion, ORAL-HEALTH, Dental Care, DENTAL EROSION, Consumer Health Information, Tooth wear, PREVALENCE, Information sources, Cross-Sectional Studies, Knowledge, Erosion, RISK-FACTORS, Educational Status, Female, Tooth Wear, Healthy Living, Young adults
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
