Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Gerodontologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Gerodontology
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Oral Frailty and Social Frailty Among Older Japanese

Authors: Isi Susanti; Hazem Abbas; Kenji Takeuchi; Jun Aida; Ken Osaka;

Oral Frailty and Social Frailty Among Older Japanese

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To examine the association between oral frailty (OF) and social frailty (SF) among independent community‐dwelling older adults in Japan. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted using data from the 2022 wave of the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES) including 19,319 functionally independent older adults aged ≥ 65 years. Oral frailty was used as an exposure variable in four ways: (1) a categorical variable (robust = 0, pre‐frail = 1, frail ≥ 2), (2) count score (sum of 5 OF components), (3) individual OF components and (4) a combined variable for the four oral functions. SF was measured using the 5‐item index (SF‐5; robust = 0, pre‐frail = 1, frail ≥ 2). Missing data were handled via multiple imputation. Ordered logistic regression models were used after adjusting for sociodemographic and health‐related covariates. Results Participants were 48.4% males and aged 65–104 years. SF prevalence was 28.3% ( n = 5466). In the adjusted models, oral frail individuals had higher odds of being socially frail (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.26–1.45) than the robust group and the highest oral frailty score (score 5) showed the highest odds (OR 2.53; 95% CI 1.50–4.27) for SF. In addition, among OF components, dry mouth had the strongest association (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.20–1.38), and those with four diminished oral functions were more likely to be socially frail (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.53–3.82). Overall, a clear gradient‐like pattern was observed with more oral frailty linked to higher odds of social frailty. Conclusion OF and its components were associated with SF among older adults in Japan. These findings might suggest the need for integrated screening and preventive strategies to mitigate social vulnerability linked to oral functional decline.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid