Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Freshwater Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Freshwater Biology
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
VTechWorks
Other literature type . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: VTechWorks
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Multiple dimensions of functional diversity affect stream fish taxonomic β‐diversity

Authors: Luke M. Bower; Lauren Stoczynski; Brandon K. Peoples; Christopher J. Patrick; Bryan L. Brown;

Multiple dimensions of functional diversity affect stream fish taxonomic β‐diversity

Abstract

Abstract When investigating metacommunity dynamics, functional differences among species are often assumed to be as important as environmental differences between sites in determining β‐diversity. However, few studies have examined the influence of functional diversity on β‐diversity. We examine the relative importance of regional functional diversity partitioned by niche dimensions and environmental variation in structuring taxonomic β‐diversity of stream fishes using a large dataset of stream fish assemblages (hereafter, simply β‐diversity). We predicted that both functional diversity and environmental variation play a role in determining β‐diversity. We tested this prediction by modelling the patterns of stream fish β‐diversity as a function of environmental variation, functional diversity and γ‐richness across 10,220 sites for 329 fish species using a series of conceptual path models. Environmental variation consistently affected β‐diversity across all models, whereas functional diversity and γ‐richness influenced β‐diversity only in some models. We show that including relevant trait differences among species in path models can improve their ability to explain β‐diversity, suggesting that functional traits influence β‐diversity. The ability of path models to explain β‐diversity varied depending on the trait grouping included in the model, demonstrating that specific path models representing different niche dimensions can improve the ability of a model to explain β‐diversity. In addition, parsing traits into different niche dimensions revealed alternative patterns of functional diversity–β‐diversity relationships that otherwise would have been missed. The selection of relevant traits and linked niche dimensions is critical for detecting relationships between functional diversity and β‐diversity. Using traits associated with different niche dimensions allows for the identification of niche dimensions most strongly associated with species sorting and the detection of patterns missed by focusing on a single niche dimension. Determining the niche dimensions that influence β‐diversity could provide insights into the processes driving biodiversity and metacommunity dynamics, improving our ability to conserve or restore aquatic communities.

Country
United States
Keywords

niche dimensions, environmental variation, traits, species sorting, metacommunities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center