Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Freshwater Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Freshwater Biology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Hidden diversity: parasites of stream arthropods

Authors: Grabner, Daniel;

Hidden diversity: parasites of stream arthropods

Abstract

Summary Parasite communities of aquatic macroinvertebrates have so far rarely been studied, even if these host organisms are of high relevance for the ecology of freshwater systems and their parasites likely affect the host populations and communities. Therefore, this study addresses this ‘hidden diversity’ in aquatic arthropods of a stream ecosystem in North Rhine‐Westphalia, Germany. Samples of benthic organisms were taken, and the most abundant host species of major invertebrate groups (amphipods and larvae of chironomids, beetles, caddisflies, mayflies, stoneflies) were tested by PCR for different parasite taxa [microsporidians, acanthocephalans (only amphipods), trematodes, nematodes]. Furthermore, the possible link between prevalence and host feeding type was investigated for each parasite group using a newly developed ‘feeding type score’. In total, 10 species of aquatic insect larvae and two amphipods of the genus Gammarus spp. were tested and 16 different isolates of microsporidians, three acanthocephalan species, six species of trematodes and one nematode were found. Microsporidians were present in all host species with prevalences ranging from 20 to 100%. Only one presumably specific host–microsporidian association was found for the mayfly Ephemera danica and three isolates were detected exclusively in amphipods. Three acanthocephalan species were detected in the amphipods with prevalences of up to 5.3%. All tested host species were infected with trematodes (prevalences 25–100%), except the caddisfly Sericostoma sp. Nematodes were detected in five host species with prevalences ranging from 14 to 80%. For several positive samples, no sequencing result could be obtained, especially for trematodes and nematodes, therefore, the actual parasite diversity might be even higher. Active filter feeding showed the highest feeding type prevalence score for microsporidia and nematodes, and passive filter feeders for trematodes, but these results have to be interpreted cautiously as only one active and one passive filter feeder species each were present in the sample. The impressive number of 26 parasite species (12 microsporidians and 10 helminths) were detected in 12 host species, mostly with surprisingly high prevalences. These results illustrate the ‘hidden diversity’ in aquatic ecosystems and highlight the importance of parasites for aquatic ecological research and the need for studies on the effects of mixed parasite infections on the host populations and communities.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biologie

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!