
doi: 10.1111/evo.13663
pmid: 30592527
Understanding the ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that shape a species' range is an important goal in evolutionary biology. Evidence indicates that mating system is an effective predictor of the global range of native species or naturalized alien plants, but the mechanisms underlying this predictability are not elaborated. Here, we develop a theoretical model to account for the ranges of plants under different mating systems based on migration-selection processes (an idea proposed by Haldane). The model includes alternation of gametophyte and sporophyte generations in one life cycle and the dispersal of haploid pollen and diploid seeds as vectors for gene flow. We show that the interaction between selfing rates and gametophytic selection determines the role of mating system in shaping a species' range. Selfing restricts the species' range under gametophytic selection in nonrandom mating systems, but expands the species' range under the absence of gametophytic selection in any mating system. Gametophytic selection slightly restricts the species' range in random mating. Both logarithmic and logistic models of population demography yield similar conclusions in the case of fixed or evolving genetic variance. The theory also helps to explain a broader relationship between mating system and range size following biological invasion or plant naturalization.
Models, Genetic, Reproduction, Seeds, Genetic Variation, Plants, Selection, Genetic, Models, Biological, Ecosystem, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Demography
Models, Genetic, Reproduction, Seeds, Genetic Variation, Plants, Selection, Genetic, Models, Biological, Ecosystem, Plant Physiological Phenomena, Demography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
