Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Equine Veterinary Jo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Equine Veterinary Journal
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison of the in‐feed glucose test and the oral sugar test

Authors: S, Smith; P A, Harris; N J, Menzies-Gow;

Comparison of the in‐feed glucose test and the oral sugar test

Abstract

Summary Reasons for performing study The in‐feed oral glucose test ( OGT ) and oral sugar test ( OST ) are advocated as field tests of insulin sensitivity in horses and ponies but have not been directly compared. Objectives To compare the insulin response to OGT and OST in 8 ponies and 5 horses of unknown insulin sensitivity. Study design Experimental, randomised crossover study. Methods Animals were fasted for 8 h overnight before and throughout testing. They were fed 1 g/kg bwt glucose powder with chaff ( OGT ) or 0.15 ml/kg bwt corn syrup ( K aro™ L ight S yrup; OST ) was administered per os in a randomised crossover study with 48 h between tests. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 30, 60, 75, 90, 120 and 180 min. The maximal insulin concentration ( C max i ), time to maximal insulin concentration ( T max i ) and area under the curve of insulin concentration over time ( AUC i ) for the tests were compared using Student's paired t test. The effect of individual subject, horse or pony and test were analysed using a linear mixed model. Results The OGT C max i (mean ± s.d.; 154 ± 116 μiu/ml), T max i (136 ± 52 min) and AUC i (15,308 ± 9886 μiu/ml/min) were significantly (P<0.05) greater compared with the OST C max i (72 ± 55 μiu/ml), T max i (63 ± 25 min) and AUC i (5980 ± 4151 μiu/ml/min). The C max i , T max i and AUC i varied significantly between individual subjects. The T max i was significantly different between horses and ponies during OGT and OST . Using previously defined criteria of insulin dysregulation, OGT identified 7/13 animals as insulin resistant, whereas OST identified 5/13 animals as insulin resistant. Conclusions The OGT and OST showed agreement in identification of insulin dysregulation in 85% of equine subjects. Results of the OGT and OST are not comparable in all cases. Further work is required to establish which test more accurately diagnoses insulin dysregulation in horses and ponies.

Keywords

Blood Glucose, Male, Cross-Over Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Glucose, Area Under Curve, Animals, Insulin, Female, Horses, Insulin Resistance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    46
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
46
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze