
doi: 10.1111/eth.12410
handle: 2268/182901
AbstractOwing to the risk of inbreeding depression, the evolution of inbreeding avoidance by means of kin recognition is expected for many biological systems. Nevertheless, an ability to distinguish among relatives and non‐relatives has been only rarely demonstrated, especially so in non‐social organisms. We here show that, in the non‐social tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana, females discriminate against relatives by preferentially mating with non‐relatives. Inbreeding avoidance was more pronounced in inbred as compared with outbred butterflies, suggesting that it is partly condition dependent. We argue that, in our system, the evolution of inbreeding avoidance is related to carrying a high genetic load and thus to being particularly sensitive to inbreeding depression. We suggest that kin recognition might be more widespread than currently thought and that future studies may possibly benefit from considering condition dependence, especially by paying attention to and/or manipulating population history, genetic load, and the risk of inbreeding depression. We further suggest that kin recognition in B. anynana might be based on cuticular hydrocarbons used for self‐referencing.
kin recognition, Entomology & pest control, Sciences de l’environnement & écologie, Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre, inbreeding, Bicyclus anynana, Life sciences, Chemistry, butterfly, Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences, Environmental sciences & ecology, Sciences du vivant, Chimie, Entomologie & lutte antiravageur
kin recognition, Entomology & pest control, Sciences de l’environnement & écologie, Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre, inbreeding, Bicyclus anynana, Life sciences, Chemistry, butterfly, Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences, Environmental sciences & ecology, Sciences du vivant, Chimie, Entomologie & lutte antiravageur
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
