
doi: 10.1111/etap.12159
We extend recent commentary about socioemotional wealth by reviewing theory and offering suggestions aimed at enhancing the correspondence between the theoretical construct and its empirical correlate. While it is clear that the field has made vast strides since its introduction in 2007, the research literature remains diverse and disjointed: an outcome we attribute, in part, to the use of underspecified research models. We hope our suggestions help researchers establish a robust methodological foundation on which future research can build.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 142 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
