
doi: 10.1111/eos.12142
pmid: 25039483
The main purpose of this study was to explore whether subjective perception of interaction with dental staff is associated with dental fear in a population‐based sample of 18‐yr‐old adolescents (n = 773). The interaction was measured using the Patient Dental Staff Interaction Questionnaire (PDSIQ), validated with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, which yielded the factors of ‘kind atmosphere and mutual communication’, ‘roughness’, ‘insecurity’, ‘trust and safety’, and ‘shame and guilt’. Dental fear was measured using the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS). Gender and sense of coherence (SOC) were included as potential confounding variables. Adolescents with high dental fear more often perceived their interaction with dental staff negatively and more often felt insecure than others. This difference persisted after adjustment for gender and SOC. In conclusion, adolescents with high dental fear may perceive their interaction with dental staff more positively if the staff succeed in creating a positive, trusting, approving, and supportive atmosphere with kindness, calmness, and patience. The communication and interaction skills of dental staff may play a particularly important role when encountering highly fearful dental patients.
Male, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Sense of Coherence, Dental Anxiety, Dental Staff, Humans, Prospective Studies, ta999, Dentist-Patient Relations, ta313, Communication, Professional-Patient Relations, Adolescent Behavior, Population Surveillance, Dental Auxiliaries, Guilt, Female, Dental Hygienists, Empathy, Safety, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Sense of Coherence, Dental Anxiety, Dental Staff, Humans, Prospective Studies, ta999, Dentist-Patient Relations, ta313, Communication, Professional-Patient Relations, Adolescent Behavior, Population Surveillance, Dental Auxiliaries, Guilt, Female, Dental Hygienists, Empathy, Safety, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
