
Abstract Diversifying agricultural landscapes may mitigate biodiversity declines and improve pest management. Yet landscapes are rarely managed to suppress pests, in part because researchers seldom measure key variables related to pest outbreaks and insecticides that drive management decisions. We used a 13‐year government database to analyse landscape effects on European grapevine moth ( Lobesia botrana ) outbreaks and insecticides across c . 400 Spanish vineyards. At harvest, we found pest outbreaks increased four‐fold in simplified, vineyard‐dominated landscapes compared to complex landscapes in which vineyards are surrounded by semi‐natural habitats. Similarly, insecticide applications doubled in vineyard‐dominated landscapes but declined in vineyards surrounded by shrubland. Importantly, pest population stochasticity would have masked these large effects if numbers of study sites and years were reduced to typical levels in landscape pest‐control studies. Our results suggest increasing landscape complexity may mitigate pest populations and insecticide applications. Habitat conservation represents an economically and environmentally sound approach for achieving sustainable grape production.
Insecticides, Farms, Life on Land, 630, ecoinformatics, Disease Outbreaks, Lobesia botrana, Animals, Letters, Pest Control, Biological, Ecosystem, Evolutionary Biology, integrated pest management, Ecology, Biological, Spain, Biological control, Ecological Applications, Pest Control, ecosystem services
Insecticides, Farms, Life on Land, 630, ecoinformatics, Disease Outbreaks, Lobesia botrana, Animals, Letters, Pest Control, Biological, Ecosystem, Evolutionary Biology, integrated pest management, Ecology, Biological, Spain, Biological control, Ecological Applications, Pest Control, ecosystem services
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 102 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
