
AbstractContact networks are fundamental to the transmission of infection and host sex often affects the acquisition and progression of infection. However, the epidemiological impacts of sex‐related variation in animal contact networks have rarely been investigated. We test the hypothesis that sex‐biases in infection are related to variation in multilayer contact networks structured by sex in a population of European badgersMeles melesnaturally infected withMycobacterium bovis. Our key results are that male‐male and between‐sex networks are structured at broader spatial scales than female‐female networks and that in male‐male and between‐sex contact networks, but not female‐female networks, there is a significant relationship between infection and contacts with individuals in other groups. These sex differences in social behaviour may underpin male‐biased acquisition of infection and may result in males being responsible for more between‐group transmission. This highlights the importance of sex‐related variation in host behaviour when managing animal diseases.
Male, 570, Epidemiology, Exponential random graph model, zoonotic disease, Bovine tuberculosis, Mustelidae, Animals, Tuberculosis, Letters, exponential random graph model, bovine tuberculosis, Social Behavior, multilayer network, badger, Sex Characteristics, Reproductive behaviour, Zoonotic disease, Badger, Mycobacterium bovis, Social structure, epidemiology, Cattle, Female, reproductive behaviour, Multilayer network, Tuberculosis, Bovine
Male, 570, Epidemiology, Exponential random graph model, zoonotic disease, Bovine tuberculosis, Mustelidae, Animals, Tuberculosis, Letters, exponential random graph model, bovine tuberculosis, Social Behavior, multilayer network, badger, Sex Characteristics, Reproductive behaviour, Zoonotic disease, Badger, Mycobacterium bovis, Social structure, epidemiology, Cattle, Female, reproductive behaviour, Multilayer network, Tuberculosis, Bovine
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
