
doi: 10.1111/eip.12052
pmid: 23682978
AbstractAimThe self‐regulatory executive function model suggests that metacognitive beliefs play a role in all forms of psychological disorder, including psychosis. However, our understanding of these beliefs and their relationship with symptoms in adolescents with an at‐risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis is limited.MethodsThe Metacognitions Questionnaire short form (MCQ‐30) was administered to 31 adolescents with an identified ARMS. Scores were subsequently compared to a control group of 76 adolescents drawn from a community population.ResultsAs predicted, ARMS patients scored significantly higher on metacognition subscales, with negative beliefs (F = 42.97, P = 0.001), cognitive confidence (F = 17.11, P = 0.001) and need for control (F = 22.48, P = 0.001) subscales of the MCQ‐30 distinguishing them from the comparison group.ConclusionsThe finding that metacognitive beliefs are significantly elevated in comparison to a community sample of adolescents is in keeping with previous adult‐orientated research. Possible implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Male, Youth, Adolescent, High risk, 150, Prodromal Symptoms, Psychosis, Thinking, Executive Function, Psychotic Disorders, Adolescent Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Metacognition, Child
Male, Youth, Adolescent, High risk, 150, Prodromal Symptoms, Psychosis, Thinking, Executive Function, Psychotic Disorders, Adolescent Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Metacognition, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
