
doi: 10.1111/edth.12573
AbstractIn this article Julian Culp offers a new conceptualization of democratic citizenship education in light of the transformations of contemporary Western societies to which the use of digital technologies has contributed. His conceptualization adopts a deliberative understanding of democracy that provides a systemic perspective on society‐wide communicative arrangements and employs a nonideal, critical methodology that concentrates on overcoming democratic deficits. Based on this systemic, deliberative conception of democracy, Culp provides an analysis of the public sphere's normative deficits and argues that current political communication may be systemically distorted. Drawing on this analysis, he suggests that practices of democratic citizenship education in digitized societies must not concentrate narrowly on the effective and responsible use of digital technologies. Instead, these practices should also focus on the economic and cultural conditions that are co‐responsible for the structural problems of political communication as well as address the democratic deficits that are reflected in inadequate communicative arrangements.
[SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science
[SHS.PHIL] Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, [SHS.SCIPO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Political science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
