
handle: 10419/319975 , 10161/13247
Abstract This article introduces corporate governance frictions into a growth model with endogenous market structure. Managers engage in corporate resource diversion and empire building. Shareholders discipline managers with incentive compensation contracts. A reform that mitigates corporate governance frictions boosts firms’ entry and, for a given market structure, has an ambiguous impact on incumbents’ return to product improvement. However, as the market structure adjusts, becoming more diffuse, incumbents invest less in product improvement. Calibrating the model to U.S. data, we find that a reform of the kind recently enacted in several advanced economies can lead to a welfare loss.
Corporate governance, ddc:330, Financial markets, Endogenous Growth, O40, Endogenous growth, Market Structure, Financial Frictions, Corporate Governance, Growth, Endogenous Growth, Market Structure, Financial Frictions, Corporate Gover- nance., Market Structure, Industry dynamics, endogenous growth; Market Structure; Financial Frictions; Corporate governance, Corporate Governance, endogenous growth, E44, Financial Frictions, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, G30, jel: jel:G30, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:O40
Corporate governance, ddc:330, Financial markets, Endogenous Growth, O40, Endogenous growth, Market Structure, Financial Frictions, Corporate Governance, Growth, Endogenous Growth, Market Structure, Financial Frictions, Corporate Gover- nance., Market Structure, Industry dynamics, endogenous growth; Market Structure; Financial Frictions; Corporate governance, Corporate Governance, endogenous growth, E44, Financial Frictions, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, G30, jel: jel:G30, jel: jel:E44, jel: jel:O40
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
