
Using a tried and tested measure of management practices that has been shown to predict firm performance, we survey nearly 250 departments across 100+ UK universities. We find large differences in management scores across universities and that departments in older, research‐intensive universities score higher than departments in newer, more teaching‐oriented universities. We also find that management matters in universities. The scores, particularly with respect to provision of incentives for staff recruitment, retention and promotion are correlated with both teaching and research performance conditional on resources and past performance. Moreover, this relationship holds for all universities, not just research‐intensive ones.
EFFICIENCY, 330, Economics, management practices; universities; performance, Social Sciences, INCENTIVES, Business & Economics, management practices; performance; universities, 14 Economics, jel: jel:I32, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:M54
EFFICIENCY, 330, Economics, management practices; universities; performance, Social Sciences, INCENTIVES, Business & Economics, management practices; performance; universities, 14 Economics, jel: jel:I32, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:M54
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 102 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
