Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Conservation Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Conservation Biology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Weaving knowledges to support wildlife health surveillance in Kenya's pastoral rangelands

Authors: Brock Bersaglio; Charis Enns; Nashipai Karinten; Ramson Karmushu; Susanne Shultz;

Weaving knowledges to support wildlife health surveillance in Kenya's pastoral rangelands

Abstract

Abstract In wildlife–livestock–human interfaces, pathogens capable of spreading between wild and domestic animals and humans have important implications for conservation outcomes, economics, and public health. Robust wildlife health surveillance can help address these risks. However, capacity and resource constraints hinder effective wildlife health surveillance at regional and national scales, particularly in lower‐ and middle‐income countries. We examined how collaboration between Indigenous Peoples and local communities (IPLCs) and wildlife health professionals may support the identification and mitigation of animal and zoonotic disease risks in remote and rural areas where wildlife surveillance remains underresourced. In the pastoral rangelands of Laikipia, Kenya, we completed interviews, focus group discussions, and elicitation methods from April 2023 to May 2024 to determine how Maasai pastoralists ( n = 57) and trained animal health professionals ( n = 10) understood wildlife health. Pastoralists held extensive place‐based knowledge of wildlife health and disease, including knowledge of clinical symptoms, species affected, transmission routes, and trends that complemented, deepened, and extended the same knowledge held by trained animal health professionals. Our results suggest that combining IPLCs’ and animal health professionals’ knowledge can benefit wildlife health surveillance by enhancing surveillance efforts, furthering mutual learning about emerging or reemerging disease, providing new understanding of disease dynamics, and, more broadly, decolonizing conservation knowledge. Two practical ways IPLCs’ knowledge could be included and availed to strengthen wildlife health surveillance and research include use of community‐led wildlife health surveillance and research and incorporation of ethnoveterinary training in formal wildlife veterinary curricula. However, precautions must be taken to ensure equitable distribution of benefits arising from knowledge sharing and to safeguard against the appropriation of knowledge associated with animal health and disease.

Country
United Kingdom
Related Organizations
Keywords

Animal disease, Enfermedad animal, Wildlife surveillance, Zoon & oacute;sis, Entrelazamiento de conocimientos, Kenya, Weaving knowledge, Salud animal, Zoonoses, Laikipia, Vigilancia animal, Wildlife health, Kenia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid