
doi: 10.1111/cge.13107
pmid: 28755412
Genetic dominance has long been considered as a qualitative reflection of interallelic interactions. Dominance arises from many multiple sources whose unifying theme is the existence of non‐linear relationships between the genotypic and phenotypic values. One of the clearest examples are dominant negative mutations (DNMs) in which a defective subunit poisons a macromolecular complex. Dominance can also be due to the presence of a heterozygous null allele, as is the case of haploinsufficiency. Dominance can also be influenced by epistatic (interloci) interactions. For instance, a pre‐existing genetic variant can make possible the expression of a pathogenic variant in a seemingly “dominant” fashion. Such interactions, which can make an individual more or less sensitive to a particular pathogenic variant, will also be discussed here.
Genotype, Gene Dosage, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Inheritance Patterns, Epistasis, Genetic, Genomics, Haploinsufficiency, Phenotype, Mutation, Animals, Humans, Genetic Association Studies, Genes, Dominant
Genotype, Gene Dosage, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Inheritance Patterns, Epistasis, Genetic, Genomics, Haploinsufficiency, Phenotype, Mutation, Animals, Humans, Genetic Association Studies, Genes, Dominant
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 88 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
