Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical & Experimen...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Research.fi
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Research.fi
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Wheat allergy in children – new tools for diagnostics

Authors: M J, Mäkelä; C, Eriksson; A, Kotaniemi-Syrjänen; K, Palosuo; J, Marsh; M, Borres; M, Kuitunen; +1 Authors

Wheat allergy in children – new tools for diagnostics

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe detection of wheat‐specific IgE in children often leads to a suspicion of wheat allergy, but little information is available on the most reliable wheat allergens for predicting clinical reactivity.ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of allergenic components of wheat in wheat allergy diagnostics.MethodsOne hundred and eight children (median age 1.5 years; range 0.6–17.3 years) with suspected wheat allergy underwent open or double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled oral wheat challenges. Responsiveness to different allergenic components of wheat was studied by skin prick tests and by determination of serum IgE antibodies using a semi‐quantitative microarray assay.ResultsThirty (28%) children reacted with immediate symptoms, and 27 (25%) with delayed symptoms to ingested wheat, whereas 51 (47%) children exhibited no reactions in oral wheat challenges. Positive IgE responses to any of the 12 allergenic components of wheat was seen in 93%, 41%, and 43% of those with immediate, delayed or no reactions to ingested wheat, respectively (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05 in every comparisons between those with immediate reactions and those with no reactions). Positive IgE responses to ≥5 different allergenic components improved significantly the diagnostic accuracy (with a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 5.10). Alpha‐amylase inhibitors (AAI), in particular dimeric AAI 0.19 (LR+ 6.12), alpha‐, beta‐, and gamma‐gliadins (LR+ from 3.57 to 4.53), and high‐molecular‐weight (HMW) glutenin subunits (LR+ 4.37) were the single allergenic components of wheat differentiating most effectively those with immediate symptoms from those who did not exhibit any reactions.Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceWheat allergy diagnostics is difficult, even using sophisticated component methods. Our results confirm earlier findings about gliadins and identify the dimeric AAI 0.19, as a relevant allergen in clinically reactive patients when compared to non‐reactive subjects. The accuracy of wheat allergy diagnosis may be improved by measuring IgE responses to several components of wheat.

Keywords

Male, Adolescent, Administration, Oral, Infant, Wheat Hypersensitivity, Allergens, Immunoglobulin E, Severity of Illness Index, ROC Curve, Antibody Specificity, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Triticum, Plant Proteins, Skin Tests

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!