
Abstract Four-month-old infants extract ordinal information in number-based and size-based visual sequences, provided that magnitude changes involve increasing relations. Here the ontogenetic origins of ordinal processing were investigated between 2018 and 2022 by testing newborns' discrimination of reversal in numerosity (Experiment 1, N = 22 White, 11 females), numerical order in the presence of redundant non-numerical quantitative cues (Experiment 2, N = 44 White, 23 females), or size-based order (Experiment 3, N = 44 White, 21 females). Newborns' post-habituation preferences revealed successful discrimination only when both numerical (items' number) and non-numerical (items' size) cues concurrently changed, and following habituation to increasing order (p = 0.017, η2p = 0.135). These findings, along with evidence from older infants and non-human animals, suggest continuity in magnitude representation across ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels.
Male, human newborns; increasing; magnitudes; ordinal computation; visual sequences, Infant, Newborn, Mathematical Concepts, human newborns; increasing; magnitudes; ordinal computation; visual sequences;, Child Development, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Empirical Article, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Size Perception
Male, human newborns; increasing; magnitudes; ordinal computation; visual sequences, Infant, Newborn, Mathematical Concepts, human newborns; increasing; magnitudes; ordinal computation; visual sequences;, Child Development, Discrimination, Psychological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Humans, Empirical Article, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Size Perception
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
