
doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12298
pmid: 36601975
Abstract Diagnostic models provide a statistical framework for designing formative assessments by classifying student knowledge profiles according to a collection of fine‐grained attributes. The context and ecosystem in which students learn may play an important role in skill mastery, and it is therefore important to develop methods for incorporating student covariates into diagnostic models. Including covariates may provide researchers and practitioners with the ability to evaluate novel interventions or understand the role of background knowledge in attribute mastery. Existing research is designed to include covariates in confirmatory diagnostic models, which are also known as restricted latent class models. We propose new methods for including covariates in exploratory RLCMs that jointly infer the latent structure and evaluate the role of covariates on performance and skill mastery. We present a novel Bayesian formulation and report a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm using a Metropolis‐within‐Gibbs algorithm for approximating the model parameter posterior distribution. We report Monte Carlo simulation evidence regarding the accuracy of our new methods and present results from an application that examines the role of student background knowledge on the mastery of a probability data set.
Models, Statistical, Bayes Theorem, covariates, Bayesian statistics, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, Markov Chains, variable selection algorithm, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Ecosystem, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology, Probability
Models, Statistical, Bayes Theorem, covariates, Bayesian statistics, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods, Markov Chains, variable selection algorithm, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Ecosystem, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
