
doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12214
pmid: 32700355
This study proposes and evaluates a diagnostic classification model framework for multiple‐choice items. Models in the proposed framework have a two‐level nested structure which allows for binary scoring (for correctness) and polytomous scoring (for distractors) at the same time. One advantage of these models is that they can provide distractor information while maintaining the statistical properties of the correct response option. We evaluated parameter recovery through a simulation study using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithms in Stan. We also discussed three approaches to implementing the proposed modelling framework for different purposes and testing scenarios. We illustrated those approaches and compared them with a binary model and a traditional nominal model through an operational study.
multiple-choice items, Models, Statistical, Psychometrics, diagnostic classification model, item response theory, nested modelling approach, distractor information, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
multiple-choice items, Models, Statistical, Psychometrics, diagnostic classification model, item response theory, nested modelling approach, distractor information, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
