
doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12155
pmid: 30756389
Cognitive diagnosis models ( CDM s) have been used as psychometric tools in educational assessments to estimate students’ proficiency profiles. However, most CDM s assume that all students adopt the same strategy when approaching problems in an assessment, which may not be the case in practice. This study develops a generalized multiple‐strategy CDM for dichotomous response data. The proposed model provides a unified framework to accommodate various condensation rules (e.g., conjunctive, disjunctive, and additive) and different strategy selection approaches (i.e., probability‐matching, over‐matching, and maximizing). Model parameters are estimated using the marginal maximum likelihood estimation via expectation‐maximization algorithm. Simulation studies showed that the parameters of the proposed model can be adequately recovered and that the proposed model was relatively robust to some types of model misspecifications. A set of real data was analysed as well to illustrate the use of the proposed model in practice.
Likelihood Functions, Psychometrics, cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing, multiple strategies, Cognition, Humans, Computer Simulation, Educational Measurement, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
Likelihood Functions, Psychometrics, cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing, multiple strategies, Cognition, Humans, Computer Simulation, Educational Measurement, Algorithms, Applications of statistics to psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
