Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ British Journal of U...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
British Journal of Urology
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Biochemical composition of urolithiasis from stone dust – a matched‐pair analysis

Authors: Eleanor R, Ray; Gill, Rumsby; R Daron, Smith;

Biochemical composition of urolithiasis from stone dust – a matched‐pair analysis

Abstract

Objective To determine if the biochemical composition of a renal calculus can be measured from ‘dust’ obtained during laser fragmentation. Patients and Methods This pilot study was set in a tertiary referral hospital between 2011 and 2013. Stone dust was aspirated through the ureteroscope during lasering and a stone fragment also retrieved. Both samples were analysed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Pairs of stone (standard) and dust were compared. They were deemed to match if both were of the same pure biochemical composition or if the predominant constituent was the same in mixed compositions, as this would not alter subsequent management. Results Paired specimens were obtained from 97 ureteroscopies. The dust specimen was sufficient for analysis in 66/97 (68%) cases. Of these, the composition matched that of the stone in 49/66 (74%) cases. In 12/66 (18%) the biochemistry differed only in the relative proportions of each constituent, whilst 5/66 (8%) showed a complete mismatch. The overall sensitivity was 51% and specificity 97%. A limitation of the study is the small number of some stone types analysed (<5 each cystine, atazanavir, mixed uric acid/calcium oxalate). Conclusion We have demonstrated in this pilot study successful proof of principle. Further work is required initially to improve the number of sufficient dust specimens. This technique may offer an option when a stone cannot be retrieved ureteroscopically.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Kidney Calculi, Matched-Pair Analysis, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Pilot Projects

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze