
doi: 10.1111/bjep.12165
pmid: 28561304
Background Numerous studies, most of them involving adolescents and adults, have evidenced a moderate negative relationship between math anxiety and math performance. There are, however, a limited number of studies that have addressed the mechanisms underlying this relation. Aims This study aimed to investigate the role of two possible mediational mechanisms between math anxiety and math performance. Specifically, we sought to test the simultaneous mediating role of working memory and math self‐concept. Sample A total of 167 children aged 8–12 years participated in this study. Methods Children completed a set of questionnaires used to assess math and trait anxiety, math self‐concept as well as measures of math fluency and math problem‐solving. Teachers were asked to rate each student's math achievement. As measures of working memory, two backward span tasks were administered to the children. Results A series of multiple mediation analyses were conducted. Results indicated that both mediators (working memory and math self‐concept) contributed to explaining the relationship between math anxiety and math achievement. Conclusions Results suggest that working memory and self‐concept could be worth considering when designing interventions aimed at helping students with math anxiety. Longitudinal designs could also be used to better understand the mediational mechanisms that may explain the relationship between math anxiety and math performance.
Male, Anxiety, Self Concept, Memory, Short-Term, Academic Performance, Humans, Female, Child, Students, Mathematics
Male, Anxiety, Self Concept, Memory, Short-Term, Academic Performance, Humans, Female, Child, Students, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 107 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
