
AbstractTruncation is a statistical phenomenon that occurs in many time‐to‐event studies. For example, autopsy‐confirmed studies of neurodegenerative diseases are subject to an inherent left and right truncation, also known as double truncation. When the goal is to study the effect of risk factors on survival, the standard Cox regression model cannot be used when the survival time is subject to truncation. Existing methods that adjust for both left and right truncation in the Cox regression model require independence between the survival times and truncation times, which may not be a reasonable assumption in practice. We propose an expectation‐maximization algorithm to relax the independence assumption in the Cox regression model under left, right, or double truncation to an assumption of conditional independence on the observed covariates. The resulting regression coefficient estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal. We demonstrate through extensive simulations that the proposed estimator has little bias and has a similar or lower mean‐squared error compared to existing estimators. We implement our approach to assess the effect of occupation on survival in subjects with autopsy‐confirmed Alzheimer's disease.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Models, Statistical, dependence, survival, Survival Analysis, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, double truncation, Methodology (stat.ME), Bias, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, left truncation, right truncation, Statistics - Methodology, Cox regression, Proportional Hazards Models
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Models, Statistical, dependence, survival, Survival Analysis, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, double truncation, Methodology (stat.ME), Bias, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, left truncation, right truncation, Statistics - Methodology, Cox regression, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
